Autor:innen:
Concetta Manno (Lugano | CH)
Giulio Disanto (Lugano | CH)
Stefania Nannoni (Lausanne | CH)
Giovanni Bianco (Lugano | CH)
Mirjam R. Heldner (Berne | CH)
Marcel Arnold (Berne | CH)
Johannes Käsmacher (Berne | CH)
Leo Bonati (Basel | CH)
Emmanuel Carrera (Genève | CH)
Urs Fischer (Berne | CH)
Timo Kahles (Aarau | CH)
Andreas Luft (Zurich | CH)
Krassen Nedeltchev (Aarau | CH)
Claudio Staedler (Lugano | CH)
Alessandro Cianfoni (Lugano | CH)
Georg Kägi (St. Gallen | CH)
Patrik Michel (Lausanne | CH)
Carlo Cereda (Lugano | CH)
Aims:Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke, large vessel occlusion (LVO) and mild symptoms have not been proven. Randomized controlled (RC) EVT trials have mainly excluded patients with NIHSS ≤ 5. We aimed at comparing functional outcome and safety after 90 days in patients with LVO and low NIHSS (≤ 5) undergoing EVT vs intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).Methods: We performed a multicentre retrospective analysis of data from the Swiss Stroke Registry. Primary endpoint was favourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were mRS shift analysis at 3 months, independence (mRS 0-2), survival with high disability (mRS 4-5), mortality and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH). IVT and EVT patients were matched 1:1 by using propensity scores (PS) based on age, sex, baseline NIHSS, pre-stroke mRS, time to treatment, occlusion site and anticoagulation therapy. Differences in outcomes were tested using multivariate logistic and ordinal regression models.Results:Out of 11’356 acute stroke patients, 339 met inclusion criteria (n=153 were treated with EVT [n=74 with direct EVT, n=79 with bridging therapy, IVT + EVT] and n=186 were treated with IVT only). After matching by PS, 126 in both groups were available for analyses. A similarly large proportion of EVT and IVT patients reached a favourable outcome at 3 months (57% vs 66% respectively; OR= 0.65, 95%CI= 0.36-1.17, p=0.15). The proportion of patients reaching independence was slightly lower in EVT than IVT (77% vs 87%; OR= 0.47, 95%CI= 0.22-1.01, p=0.054). EVT patients also had greater mRS at 3 months by shift analysis (OR= 1.60; 95%CI= 1.02-2.54, p=0.043). This was largely mediated by higher mortality rates among EVT than IVT (10% vs 3%; OR= 3.51, 95%CI= 1.04-11.85, p= 0.043), while the proportion of survived patients with high disability was similarly low (6% vs 3%; OR=2.56, 95%CI=0.68-9.61, p=0.165). sICH were overall relatively rare in two groups (EVT 5% vs IVT 1%, OR= 5.58, 95%CI= 0.57-54.86, p=0.140. Age was inversely associated with independency (OR= 0.94, 95%CI= 0.91-0.98, p=0.002).Conclusion: In acute stroke patients with LVO and mild neurological symptoms, EVT and IVT appear similarly effective in terms of achieving a favourable functional outcome at 3 months, but EVT might be inferior to IVT with regard to mortality and outcome across all levels of disability. Further research is needed.